|
|
Post by bluefedish on Feb 20, 2008 1:30:53 GMT -5
In your opinion a sighting may only be claimed as a visible apparition if it _________?
|
|
|
|
Post by JayMan on Feb 20, 2008 15:07:58 GMT -5
...is seen by more than one person.
Stronger Argument:
...can be/has been photographed on more than one occasion.
Are ALL apparitions humanoid?
|
|
|
|
Post by WOLF on Feb 20, 2008 18:00:33 GMT -5
___ is witnessed by more than one person. The report becomes exponentially more credible when the stories match as well as visual documentation is taken (ie. Raw/ unaltered photos and videos.) Matching repots shall be mostly (if not exactly) similar in the descriptions on appearance, location, actions of the “entity”, evidence taken, and reported by the sole person without their statement comparing to another source of information (ie. “I saw this ghost and it looked and did the same stuff as this youtube video by that grade school kid”).
I also believe strongly that all Apparitions are not humanoid. In countless reports around the world, there are reports that they can be in other "forms" such as mammals, birds, reptiles, insects, and arachnids. For example, there are reports in the orient for many centuries of Apparitions of animals such as mockingbirds, crows, spiders, foxes, cats, or large canines.
|
|
|
|
Post by JayMan on Feb 20, 2008 23:40:04 GMT -5
Good to have you back, old man.
|
|
|
|
Post by bluefedish on Feb 21, 2008 12:41:15 GMT -5
Well that's good to know that they don't just come in human. 
|
|
|
|
Post by WOLF on Feb 21, 2008 22:00:45 GMT -5
Thank you. Surgery is tomorrow. Hopefully in a week I will be back to my usual self.
|
|
